Their rights to shoot the President because he's black and because they don't like him are being trampled! Just because an overwhelming majority of this country voted him in to office doesn't mean they don't have the right to shoot him with their unconcealed weapons.If we let big government take away those men's rights what's next? Do we let them take away your right to stab hobos? Are sex offenders rights to fling their seed on unsuspecting people in public going to go by the wayside next? And damn it, what about my right to poison the water supply of colleges and universities who teach all that liberal dogma and evolution nonsense?
6 comments:
You freedom lover!!! 9-11!!!!
Because I was born in 1969, I missed to vitriol of the civil rights movement. I mean, reading about it after it happened is much different than living it.
So when I saw a History Channel program about the KKK, and what was going on in opposition to the Civil Rights Act and such, it alarmed me how similar the anti-Obama crowd and the KKK sound.
And back then, they didn't have a Fox News or right-wing talk radio to fan their flames.
I mean "vitriol directed AT the civil rights movement."
Nicely done. But what I wonder is where the fuck is the Secret Service and why haven't these gun toting nut cases been whisked off to gitmo or some other gulag? That's what they would have done when they were protecting Dubbya.
Why can't the groundwork be laid right now. Wherever the POTUS may be speaking, the law of the land (carrying concealed/unconcelaed guns) is suspended. Sounds easy to me...but oh, I forgot - they have rights!! And I have the right to call them fukktards - right???
So, how does the court rule when these assholes expression of their 2nd amendment rights chills everyone else's 1st amendment rights? Not that I would like to see that case go to the current Supreme Court. That is, I think part of the reason they are doing it is to scare the libruls. And to compensate for a small penis, naturally.
Post a Comment